- Growth with Gary
- Posts
- Monetizing AI SaaS: 3 Steps to Packaging & Pricing Success
Monetizing AI SaaS: 3 Steps to Packaging & Pricing Success
Stop guessing about monetizing AI. Learn the 3-step AI product packaging framework, when to use a bundle pricing strategy, and how to drive AI feature monetization.
Gary Chan
January 15, 2026
Table of Contents
The AI Packaging Problem Nobody's Talking About
The market is still maturing and trying to understand the value of AI products. If you go to a grocery store, you know the value of an orange, an apple, or a carton of milk, and you know how to use them. In software, what is the value of this AI feature in what I do? You've never used it before.
When a prospect lands on your pricing page, they have five seconds to decide if an AI feature is worth their money. But they are asking themselves: What's the actual value of this AI feature in my workflow? I've never used something like this. How many credits will I burn through? Is this going to save me time, or create more work?
This is the core challenge of the AI era in SaaS: packaging is not a pricing problem, it's a positioning problem. It forces your positioning into reality. If you position a product as "enterprise-grade," you package it with SSO and advanced security. If you position it as a "PLG self-serve," you package it with a free trial. Your packaging tells the customer exactly where the product fits in their life and who it's for.
Founders who nail this strategic alignment are seeing 3-5x ACV lifts and faster sales cycles with their existing customer base.
The next lever in self-serve, product-led growth is pricing, monetization, and packaging.
Why Is AI Packaging Harder Than Traditional SaaS?
I have been selling AI products for the last two years, working actively on the front lines with a product mindset.
Back in 2023, there was a big focus on educating customers. Customers were still asking, "What are AI products? How is it going to be beneficial for me? How do they work? What's the pricing model? When would I need to use it if it's not subscription based? How often do I need to use this? Is this safe? Is it sending my data to OpenAI blackhole and into the AI world, taking my data?"
Customers still have many early-level questions about AI, its features, and how to use them. They also don't want to be surprised by unexpected charges. There's a lot of hesitation because it seems unpredictable in many ways, pricing, usage, outcomes. It's a black box, and people wonder what they're going to get out of it. This is especially true when charging by credits. Customers ask, "How many credits do I need to get the most effective use out of it?"
But here's the reality: customers have no baseline for value. They don't know if they need one week, three days, or five minutes of learning to see ROI. This creates three specific packaging challenges:
1. Dynamic Costs: Your cost per token, hosting, fine-tuning, and model retraining are moving targets. Customers see credit-based pricing and immediately wonder: How many credits do I actually need to get genuine value? That uncertainty kills conversions.
2. Volatile Usage: Unlike a SaaS seat (which is predictable), AI usage patterns are all over the map. Customers can't forecast their consumption, and neither can you in their contracts.
3. Unproven ROI: Customers are genuinely unsure if the investment will pay off. Without seeing outcomes from similar companies, they hesitate. This hesitation is the killer, not the price, but the indecision.
These challenges aren't just pricing problems. They are positioning problems. Because an uncertain value means customers can't self-select into the right tier. They freeze. And when customers freeze, you lose.
What Does "Packaging as Positioning" Mean for AI Monetization?
Your packaging tells a story about who your product is for and what it's worth. The best packaging strategies align with how customers think about the tool, not how you built it. I've learned from experts like Palle Broe that packaging is the ultimate strategic lever. It forces your positioning into reality.
Before you launch a new AI feature, ask yourself these four questions:
Who specifically has this pain? (If it's "everyone," it should be bundled. If it's "sales teams in compliance-heavy industries," it's an add-on.)
How urgent is the pain? (Urgent = standalone or high-value add-on. Mild = bundle or skip.)
Will they use it without hand-holding? (Low friction = bundle. High friction = add-on where early adopters self-select.)
What would they pay for it separately? (High willingness = add-on or standalone. Low willingness = bundle or free inclusion.)
Does it confuse our core value prop? (Yes = separate tier or add-on. No = bundle.)
Answer those questions, and the packaging decision becomes obvious.
When Should Each Packaging Model Be Used?
Your packaging model directly determines your monetization ceiling. A standalone AI feature that solves acute pain can command 5-10x the price of the same feature bundled into a plan, but it only works for the 15% of customers who have acute pain.
Packaging Model | When to Use It | Customer Segment | Success Metric | Monetization Impact |
Standalone | Feature solves a specific, painful problem that a subset of customers face acutely; low feature overlap with core product | Sales / compliance teams are drowning in one specific workflow | High CAC, high LTV, small TAM | High price point (customers already feel pain), easy to justify cost |
Add-On | Low usage frequency + high value when needed; not essential but highly valuable to the right customer | Self-selected users who recognize they have the pain | High attachment rate, high NRR, easy to sell | Medium price point, high expansion revenue, low churn for adopters |
Bundled | 75%+ of customer base will use it or benefits from inclusion even without active use; reduces complexity or is obvious value-add | General user base; feature feels like table stakes | Improved plan stickiness, reduced churn, cleaner pricing page | Lower per-unit revenue, but higher LTV through retention |
How Should You Decide: Standalone vs. Add-On vs. Bundled? A Decision Framework
Step 1: Identify the Core Job Your AI Solves
Example: If you built AI security questionnaire automation, the job isn't "fill out compliance forms faster." It's "unlock deals that were blocked by security questionnaires."
You need to examine in depth what problem your AI actually solves. This determines everything about packaging and monetization.
Step 2: Determine Your Baseline Usage Pattern
Who needs this feature, and how often?
AI meeting assistants? Sales uses it daily, engineers maybe monthly.
AI code assistants? Developers use it constantly.
AI image generation? Designers use it daily, marketers weekly
This is your segmentation variable. It determines everything about monetization feasibility.
Step 3: Run the Three-Path Test
When you launch a new AI feature, test it in all three packaging models with different customer segments:
Path A (Standalone): Lead high-pain-point customers through a dedicated sales flow. Ask, "Does your business have a specific need for [this problem]?" If yes, pitch it as a separate product. If no, pivot.
Path B (Add-On): For prospects with broader needs, offer it as an optional add-on at signup. "You have content needs, do you also need AI image generation?"
Path C (Bundled): For mid-market, include it in your premium package and measure adoption and upsell velocity.
Let the market tell you which model sticks.
When Should You Monetize AI as a Standalone Product?
Standalone AI products work only when you have acute, specific pain + a niche audience willing to pay premium prices.
Standalone fails for most features. It only works if the feature:
Solves a problem customers are actively hurting from (not nice-to-have).
Addresses a specific vertical (not horizontal).
Has high willingness-to-pay because the pain is acute.
Attracts customers who would search for a dedicated solution.
Example: Github Copilot vs. Github. They are two different products, solving different pain points. One is for developers who need AI-assisted coding. The other is for teams managing repositories. Different positioning, different customers, different pricing.
When Does the Add-On Model Work and When Does It Fail?
When Does the Add-On Model work?
Add-ons are the hardest to get right because you're asking customers to make a second buying decision. Before you package an AI feature as an add-on, it must meet 3 out of 4 criteria:
Usage is "Spikey": Customers don't use it every day, but when they do, they use it intensely.
High Perceived Value: The output saves hours of manual work instantly (e.g., generating a full report vs. writing a single email).
Self-Selection: Only a specific subset of your customers (e.g., <40%) actually needs it.
No Core Cannibalization: Selling it separately doesn't make your main "Pro" plan feel incomplete or broken.
Example: AI Advanced Reporting in a Project Management Tool
Imagine you run a PM tool like Asana or Monday. You build an AI feature that scans all tasks and predicts project delays three months out.
Why it works as an add-on: Not every project manager cares about predictive analytics. Small teams just want to track tasks. But for Enterprise Program Managers, this prediction saves their job. It is high value, low frequency (monthly review), and specific to a subset.
The Result: You sell it as a "Predictive Insights" add-on for $49/mo. The 20% of power users buy it instantly. The 80% of basic users aren't annoyed by a price hike for a feature they don't understand.
When Does the Add-On Model fail?
Usage is low AND value is unclear. Example: A generic AI text summarizer. Customers might say, "I can do this in ChatGPT" or "My other tool does this." They won't pay separately.
The feature muddles your core value prop. If your main product solves project management, and you're selling an AI add-on for expense reports, you're confusing the buyer.
Figure out whats leading feature customers want to buy, check out
Real-World Case Study: The AI Security Questionnaire Decision Tree
We tested AI security questionnaire automation across all three packaging models with our small business customers:
1. Standalone Path (Failed)
We built a landing page: "Stop wasting time on questionnaires."
Result: Cold traffic converted at 2-3%. The ICP was too small. Most prospects needed a full compliance platform first, not just a form filler.
2. Bundled Path (Failed)
We included it in our premium "All-in-one" package for a higher price point.
Result: Customers felt ripped off. They didn't need questionnaire automation. For those who don't want to use it, as mentioned, the bundle here doesn't make sense. Now they were being charged for a feature they'd never use. When it came time to upsell, the negotiation started: "Can you remove the questionnaire automation and reduce the price?"
3. Add-On Path (Winner)
Discovery: We asked in lead forms and onboarding: "Is security a main challenge?"
Test Drive: We gave 2 free credits to prove value.
Offer: We pitched it as an optional add-on to those with identified pain.
Result: 10-20% of compliance customers added it. They saw immediate ROI. It drove clean revenue with happy customers and no bloat.
Learn more about upsell paywalls and how to get customers to buy more.
When Should You Bundle AI Features Into Existing Plans?
You know what kills sales more than any feature gap? Indecision according to JOLT Effect. When customers face complex packaging, they freeze. They can't compare plans or predict costs.
Bundle into existing plans only if 75%+ of your customers will use the feature, even if they wouldn't buy it separately. Think "Table Stakes,” capabilities users expect just to be competitive.
Example: AI Grammar and Tone Check in a Support Desk
If you are building a customer support helpdesk (like Zendesk or Intercom), you might build an AI feature that fixes grammar and softens the tone of angry agent replies.
Why you MUST bundle: No support team is going to pay an extra $20/month just for a spellchecker. They will say, "Grammarly is free," or "My browser does that."
However: If you don't have it, they will hate your product because they have to copy-paste text into another tool.
The Strategy: You bundle it into the "Pro" plan. It becomes a retention hook. It makes the daily workflow smoother. It doesn't drive new ACV on its own, but it protects your churn and justifies the base price.
The mistake most founders make is over-bundling to increase plan value. They add three new AI features to a plan and suddenly the package becomes bloated. Now the customer is paying for four things they don't use to get the one thing they do need. They feel ripped off. They negotiate down. You are in a worse position than if you'd kept the package simple and offered the extra features as Add-ons.
I also think the packaging is an ongoing experiment and iteration.
As you try to sell to new ICPs and launching new features, some of them will be usage-based, while others will be seat-based. You want to cross-sell product lines. Stay in tune with your customers.
Why Does Complicated Pricing Kill Sales?
The mistake most founders make is over-complicating their pricing tiers to "capture every dollar." They add three new AI features, create a "Plus" tier, an "Ultra" tier, and an "AI Add-on" pack.
Suddenly, the customer is staring at a 5-column pricing grid trying to calculate if they need "500 AI credits" or "Unlimited Basic AI."
Studies show that reducing pricing tiers from four to three can increase conversion rates by up to 27%. (Source: SaaStock) When customers have to do math to figure out your pricing, they default to "No."
The fix is simple: simplicity beats complexity. The most successful AI SaaS companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, GitHub Copilot) use clear pricing. OpenAI: $20/month for Plus. GitHub Copilot: $10/month. No calculators. No confusion.
Customers want to look at a plan and immediately know if it's for them.
Should I build a pricing calculator?
We once built a pricing calculator to show customers how bundling saved them money. It backfired. Instead of seeing savings, customers saw complexity. The calculator created more objections: "Why am I paying for X if I don't use it?", "Can we remove Y and reduce the price?", "Your competitors don't bundle this way." Instead of complexity, customers want simplicity. They want to look at a plan and immediately know if it's for them.
I created the pricing calculator page. Theoretically, it made sense, but in practice, it didn't.
I didn't have time to go over it with the customer on the call. A lot of the terminology is still not very simple, and it ended up being more confusing than just making the pricing page with simple tiers, and whether they buy or not.
What is the Adoption Lifecycle and where does bundling fail?
Your packaging strategy is only as good as your ability to activate customers on the features you're including. Customers don't care about features. They care about outcomes. And outcomes only happen if they actually use the AI product.
The adoption lifecycle looks like this:
Signup (This is where five-second pricing page decisions happen)
First Run (Does the AI feature work? Is it useful? Can they understand the output?)
Learning Phase (They experiment, iterate, and figure out how to get value)
Habitual Use (It becomes part of their workflow)
Value Expansion (They increase usage, pay more, or buy add-ons)
Most AI product teams optimize for steps 1-2, Signup and First Run. They build beautiful onboarding and product tours. But the critical bottleneck is step 3: the Learning Phase.
With AI, the learning phase is unpredictable. Some customers get it in five minutes. Others need a week. Some never get it.
Here's what happens when you bundle a "nice-to-have" AI feature into your plan:
Month 1-2: Customer ignores the feature (too busy, don't know how to use it).
Month 3: They realize it exists but decide "I don't really need this."
Month 6: When you pitch an upgrade, they push back: "You already included this AI thing, and I never used it. Why would I pay more?"
Month 12 (Churn): They realize they're paying a premium for a "comprehensive platform" but only using 20% of it. They downgrade to a cheaper competitor.
The lesson: Bundling nice-to-haves doesn't increase value, it dilutes it. If a feature isn't essential (used by >75%), keep it out of the core bundle.
Features with steep learning curves should never be bundled into base plans. The activation friction will destroy your NRR (net revenue retention). Instead, sell them as add-ons to customers who are pre-qualified and motivated. You attract customers who are ready to learn. They have the pain. They are motivated. Higher activation. Lower support burden. Higher stickiness.
How to Validate Your AI Feature Packaging Before Launch?
Don't guess. Test.
Step 1: Customer Interviews
Talk to 10-15 customers who have the pain your AI solves. Ask three questions:
"How often do you encounter [the problem]?"
"How much time/money does [the problem] cost you annually?"
"Would you buy a tool specifically for this or would you prefer it included with your main product?"
Their answer tells you everything.
Step 2: Landing Page Tests
Build three simple landing pages:
Standalone: "AI [Feature] – Standalone Product"
Add-on: "AI [Feature] – Upgrade Your Current Plan"
Included: "AI [Feature] – Now Included in Premium Plan"
Run $500 in paid traffic to each. Measure signups and conversation rates. The best performer tells you which packaging resonates.
Step 3: Actual Customer Feedback
Once you launch, track:
Usage percentage – What % of customers with access to the feature actually use it?
Churn rate by feature adoption – Do customers who use it stay longer?
Expansion revenue – Does the feature drive upgrades or add-on sales?
If usage is low and churn is high, you've bundled wrong. Pivot to add-on or eliminate.
The Bottom Line: Biggest Packaging Lessons
These are the biggest packaging lessons:
Package first, price second.
The placement of a feature drives more revenue than its price.
Use a decision tree.
Test all three models (standalone, add-on, bundled) to see what sticks.
Bundling is only for table stakes.
If it's anything less than essential, it's an add-on.
Adoption is the real metric.
A bundled feature with 20% usage is a liability, not a value-add.
Simplicity beats complexity.
Customers freeze when confused. Clean, simple packaging wins.
Your packaging tells a story.
It positions your product and attracts the right customer segment.
The AI SaaS companies winning aren't the ones with the most sophisticated pricing models. They're the ones who understood that packaging is a product decision, not a finance decision. They made it simple. They made it clear. And they let customers self-select into the packaging that was right for them.
I write weekly about my learning on launching and leading PLG. Feel free to subscribe.
I am Gary Yau Chan. 3x Head of Growth. 2x Founder. Product Led Growth specialist. 26x hackathon winner. I write about #PLG and #BuildInPublic. Please follow me on LinkedIn, or read about what you can hire me for on my Notion page.